{"id":116205,"date":"2025-05-23T08:36:11","date_gmt":"2025-05-23T08:36:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/?p=116205"},"modified":"2025-05-23T08:36:11","modified_gmt":"2025-05-23T08:36:11","slug":"googlein-kirli-yuzu-aciga-cikti-sistematik-olarak-delilleri-yok-etti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/2025\/05\/23\/googlein-kirli-yuzu-aciga-cikti-sistematik-olarak-delilleri-yok-etti\/","title":{"rendered":"Google\u2019\u0131n kirli y\u00fcz\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131: Sistematik olarak delilleri yok etti"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><figure> <span> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/googlein-kirli-yuzu-aciga-cikti-sistematik-olarak-delilleri-yok-etti-0-2njFPmwa.jpg\"\/> <\/span> Teknoloji devi <strong>Google<\/strong>, son 15 y\u0131lda \u015firket i\u00e7i ileti\u015fimde bir \u201c<strong>silme<\/strong>\u201d k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc olu\u015fturarak yasal risklerden ka\u00e7\u0131nmay\u0131 hedefleyen bir strateji benimsedi. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na mesajlar\u0131n\u0131 yok etmeyi, belirli kelimelerden ka\u00e7\u0131nmay\u0131 ve avukatlar\u0131 ileti\u015fimde s\u00fcrekli dahil etmeyi \u00f6nerdi. \u015eirketin bu politikalar\u0131, son bir y\u0131lda g\u00f6r\u00fclen <strong>\u00fc\u00e7 antitr\u00f6st<\/strong> (Epic Games ve ABD Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131) davas\u0131nda detayl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde g\u00fcn y\u00fcz\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. <\/figure>\n<p><b>Temeller 2008\u2019de at\u0131ld\u0131<\/b><\/p>\n<p>New York Times\u2019\u0131n haberine g\u00f6re 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda <strong>Google<\/strong>, <strong>Yahoo<\/strong> ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir reklam anla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n antitr\u00f6st denetimine tabi tutulmas\u0131 ve \u00e7e\u015fitli patent, ticari marka ve telif hakk\u0131 davalar\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmas\u0131yla bu s\u00fcrecin temel ta\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6\u015fedi. Y\u00f6neticiler, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara g\u00f6nderilen gizli bir notta, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n \u201cs\u0131cak konular\u201d hakk\u0131nda yazmadan \u00f6nce iki kez d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmeleri gerekti\u011fini vurgulad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Google\u2019\u0131n anl\u0131k mesajla\u015fma ara\u00e7lar\u0131nda da de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131larak, mesajlar\u0131n \u201ckay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131\u201d olarak g\u00f6nderilmesi varsay\u0131lan ayar haline getirildi. Bu sayede, dikkatsizce yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ifadeler ertesi g\u00fcn otomatik olarak siliniyordu.<\/p>\n<p><b>Avukat-m\u00fcvekkil ayr\u0131cal\u0131\u011f\u0131 kalkan olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Google ayr\u0131ca avukat-m\u00fcvekkil ayr\u0131cal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bir t\u00fcr yasal kalkan olarak kullanma politikas\u0131 izledi. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlara, e-postalara \u201c<strong>avukat-m\u00fcvekkil ayr\u0131cal\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong>\u201d notu eklemeleri ve m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse bir Google avukat\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131c\u0131 listesine dahil etmeleri talimat\u0131 verildi. Bu, s\u00f6z konusu ileti\u015fimlerde yasal bir tart\u0131\u015fma olmasa bile uygulan\u0131yordu.<\/p>\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, yasal s\u00fcre\u00e7ler i\u00e7in dok\u00fcman saklama zorunlulu\u011funa ra\u011fmen, Google anl\u0131k mesajla\u015fmalar\u0131 bu kapsam\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tuttu. Bir davaya dahil olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar, yaln\u0131zca kendi inisiyatifleriyle sohbet ge\u00e7mi\u015fini a\u00e7\u0131k tutabiliyordu ve \u00e7o\u011funluk bu \u00f6zelli\u011fi kullanm\u0131yordu.<\/p>\n<p>Bu stratejiler, antitr\u00f6st davalar\u0131nda yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131n sert ele\u015ftirilerine maruz kald\u0131. Epic davas\u0131na ba\u015fkanl\u0131k eden Kaliforniya Kuzey B\u00f6lgesi ABD B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi Yarg\u0131c\u0131 James Donato, Google\u2019\u0131n \u201c<strong>kan\u0131tlar\u0131n bast\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda k\u00f6kl\u00fc bir k\u00fclt\u00fcr<\/strong>\u201d olu\u015fturdu\u011funu ve bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n \u201cadalet y\u00f6netimine do\u011frudan bir sald\u0131r\u0131\u201d oldu\u011funu ifade etti.<\/p>\n<p>Google\u2019\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Amazon ve Albertsons gibi di\u011fer b\u00fcy\u00fck \u015firketlerin de benzer uygulamalarla g\u00fcndeme gelmesi, bu t\u00fcr yakla\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131n teknoloji ve i\u015f d\u00fcnyas\u0131nda yayg\u0131n bir e\u011filim olabilece\u011fini g\u00f6steriyor. \u00d6rne\u011fin, Federal Ticaret Komisyonu (FTC), Amazon y\u00f6neticilerinin Signal gibi mesajla\u015fma ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak rekabet konular\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. FTC ayr\u0131ca, Albertsons\u2019\u0131n i\u015f mesajlar\u0131n\u0131 silerek yasal gereklilikleri ihlal etti\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201cMuhtemelen \u00e7ok say\u0131da kan\u0131t yok edildi\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n<figure> <span> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/googlein-kirli-yuzu-aciga-cikti-sistematik-olarak-delilleri-yok-etti-1-7SkynKqR.jpg\"\/> <\/span> Google, reklam teknolojisiyle ilgili antitr\u00f6st davas\u0131na bakan Virginia Do\u011fu B\u00f6lgesi B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi Yarg\u0131c\u0131 Leonie Brinkema taraf\u0131ndan da sert ele\u015ftirilere maruz kald\u0131. Yarg\u0131\u00e7 Brinkema, A\u011fustos ay\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bir duru\u015fmada, Google\u2019\u0131n belge saklama politikalar\u0131n\u0131n \u201csorumlu bir kurumsal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015fleyi\u015fine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d belirtti ve \u201c<strong>\u00e7ok fazla kan\u0131t\u0131n muhtemelen yok edildi\u011fini<\/strong>\u201d s\u00f6yledi. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, eksik belgelerin Google aleyhine bir varsay\u0131m olu\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti ve bunun \u015firketin tekel g\u00fcc\u00fc ve rekabet kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131na dair davalarda ge\u00e7erli olmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi. Davada kapan\u0131\u015f konu\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki g\u00fcnlerde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 planlan\u0131yor. <\/figure>\n<p><b>\u015eirketlerin \u201cMarie Kondo\u201dsu<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Adeta <strong>\u015firketlerin Marie Kondo\u2019su<\/strong> haline gelen Google\u2019\u0131n belge d\u00fczenleme politikalar\u0131 baz\u0131 uzmanlar taraf\u0131ndan \u201ckurumsal bir d\u00fczen ve minimalizm\u201d \u00e7abas\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclse de, bu durumun \u015feffafl\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ters etki yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade ediliyor. Gonzaga \u00dcniversitesi Hukuk Fak\u00fcltesi\u2019nden Profes\u00f6r Agnieszka McPeak, <em>\u201cGoogle, yukar\u0131dan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya bir politikayla \u2018bizi k\u00f6t\u00fc g\u00f6sterebilecek hi\u00e7bir \u015feyi saklamay\u0131n\u2019 anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 benimsemi\u015f\u201d<\/em> dedi. Ancak bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n, tam tersi bir alg\u0131 yaratarak \u015firketi daha \u015f\u00fcpheli duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc de ekledi.<\/p>\n<p><b>Microsoft\u2019un g\u00f6lgesi<\/b><\/p>\n<figure> <span> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/googlein-kirli-yuzu-aciga-cikti-sistematik-olarak-delilleri-yok-etti-2-iI1Bw1ku.jpg\"\/> <\/span> Google\u2019\u0131n bu t\u00fcr \u00f6nlemleri benimsemesinin arkas\u0131nda, 1998 y\u0131l\u0131nda Microsoft\u2019a kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan antitr\u00f6st davas\u0131n\u0131n etkisi oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcl\u00fcyor. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Microsoft\u2019un internet taray\u0131c\u0131 pazar\u0131nda tekelci davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymak i\u00e7in \u015firket i\u00e7i belgeleri kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu belgelerde, \u00fcst d\u00fczey y\u00f6neticilerin agresif ve tehditkar dil kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015fti. \u00d6rne\u011fin, Apple&#8217;\u0131 bir \u00f6zelli\u011fi kald\u0131rmaya ikna etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir y\u00f6neticinin \u201cBebe\u011fi b\u0131\u00e7aklaman\u0131z\u0131 istiyoruz\u201d ifadesini kullanmas\u0131 davan\u0131n kilit noktalar\u0131ndan biri olmu\u015ftu. <\/figure>\n<p>Microsoft davay\u0131 kaybetti, ancak karar temyizde k\u0131smen bozulmu\u015ftu. Yine de bu, Google ve di\u011ferleri i\u00e7in bir emsal olarak kay\u0131tlara ge\u00e7ti.<\/p>\n<p><b>Google b\u00fcy\u00fcd\u00fck\u00e7e kelime da\u011farc\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcld\u00fc<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Google, b\u00fcy\u00fcd\u00fck\u00e7e \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n dilini ve yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 daha da s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya ba\u015flad\u0131. 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda haz\u0131rlanan \u201cArama Ekibi i\u00e7in Antitr\u00f6st Temelleri\u201d adl\u0131 bir belgede, \u201c<strong>pazar<\/strong>,\u201d \u201c<strong>pazar pay\u0131<\/strong>\u201d veya \u201c<strong>hakimiyet<\/strong>\u201d gibi kelimelerin kullan\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edildi. \u015eirket, sava\u015f ya da spor metaforlar\u0131ndan, kazan\u00e7 ya da kay\u0131p kavramlar\u0131ndan tamamen ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi.<\/p>\n<figure> <span> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/googlein-kirli-yuzu-aciga-cikti-sistematik-olarak-delilleri-yok-etti-3-PDW31PKt.jpg\"\/> <\/span> Google\u2019\u0131n, yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 yasal s\u00fcre\u00e7lerden uzak tutmak i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu y\u00f6ntemler, bir kez daha ele\u015ftiri oklar\u0131n\u0131n hedefi oldu. \u015eirketin, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n avukatlar\u0131 yaz\u0131\u015fmalara dahil ederek \u201c<strong>yasal ayr\u0131cal\u0131k<\/strong>\u201d kalkan\u0131 olu\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 te\u015fvik etti\u011fi belgeler, \u00f6zellikle Epic Games\u2019in a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada dikkat \u00e7ekti. Google\u2019\u0131n CEO\u2019su Sundar Pichai\u2019nin 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda bir y\u00f6neticisine g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, \u201cAttorney Client Privileged, Confidential\u201d ifadesini i\u00e7eren e-posta, asl\u0131nda herhangi bir yasal ba\u011flam ta\u015f\u0131mamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen yasal koruma gerek\u00e7esiyle mahkemeden saklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu belge, Epic\u2019in itiraz\u0131yla koruma kapsam\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131. <\/figure>\n<p>Dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda Google\u2019\u0131n ba\u015f hukuk m\u00fc\u015faviri Kent Walker, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n \u201cayr\u0131cal\u0131k\u201d kavram\u0131n\u0131 \u201cgizli\u201d ile kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savundu. Ancak Epic davas\u0131ndaki kan\u0131tlar, baz\u0131 Google avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n bu uygulamay\u0131 \u201c<strong>sahte ayr\u0131cal\u0131k<\/strong>\u201d olarak adland\u0131rarak alayc\u0131 bir tav\u0131r sergiledi\u011fini ortaya koydu. Walker, bu ifadeyi duydu\u011funda \u201chayal k\u0131r\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d ve \u201c\u015fa\u015f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n<p>Dava sonucunda j\u00fcri, Epic Games\u2019in t\u00fcm iddialar\u0131nda hakl\u0131 oldu\u011funa karar verdi. Bunun ard\u0131ndan, Kent Walker\u2019\u0131n Kaliforniya Eyalet Barosu taraf\u0131ndan Google\u2019\u0131 belge yok etmeye te\u015fvik etti\u011fi iddialar\u0131yla soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 talep edildi.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201cVegas\u2019ta olan Vegas\u2019ta kal\u0131r\u201d k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Eyl\u00fcl 2023&#8217;te, Google internet aramas\u0131ndaki hakimiyeti nedeniyle bir antitr\u00f6st davas\u0131nda yarg\u0131lan\u0131rken, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015firketin on binlerce belgeyi ayr\u0131cal\u0131kl\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek saklad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. Belgeler mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan incelendi\u011finde, hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde ayr\u0131cal\u0131kl\u0131 olmad\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<figure> <span> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/googlein-kirli-yuzu-aciga-cikti-sistematik-olarak-delilleri-yok-etti-4-xJVDw3si.jpg\"\/> <\/span> Mahkeme <strong>Yarg\u0131c\u0131 Amit P. Mehta<\/strong>, Google&#8217;\u0131n Microsoft&#8217;tan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ders ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131 \u201ck\u00f6t\u00fc\u201d kan\u0131t yaratmamalar\u0131 konusunda etkin bir \u015fekilde e\u011fitti\u011fini belirtti. Yarg\u0131\u00e7 Mehta sonu\u00e7ta bunun \u00f6nemli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi: A\u011fustos ay\u0131nda <strong>Google&#8217;\u0131 tekel olmaktan su\u00e7lu buldu.<\/strong> <\/figure>\n<p>Google\u2019\u0131n delilleri saklama ve yok etme k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 o kadar a\u015f\u0131lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ki baz\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar, YouTube\u2019un eski i\u015f geli\u015ftirme direkt\u00f6r\u00fc Robert Kyncl, bir keresinde gizli bir belgeyi e-postayla g\u00f6ndermek yerine fakslamay\u0131 tercih etti. 2021&#8217;deki bir grup sohbetinde bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u015f\u00f6yle soruyordu: \u201cGe\u00e7mi\u015fi burada tutmam\u0131n sak\u0131ncas\u0131 var m\u0131? Haf\u0131za ama\u00e7l\u0131 baz\u0131 bilgileri saklamam gerekiyor.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 avukatlar\u0131ndan birisi reklam teknolojisi davas\u0131n\u0131n A\u011fustos ay\u0131ndaki duru\u015fmas\u0131nda Google \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n bu kay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131 sohbetleri \u2018Vegas\u2019 olarak adland\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Ancak Holywood\u2019dan bildi\u011fimiz gibi <strong>Vegas&#8217;ta olan genelde Vegas&#8217;ta kalm\u0131yor.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>2023 y\u0131l\u0131na gelindi\u011finde, ABD Federal Ticaret Komisyonu (FTC) ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, mesajla\u015fma uygulamalar\u0131 \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan ileti\u015fimlerin de yasal belge kapsam\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini net bir \u015fekilde belirtti. Buna yan\u0131t olarak, Google, yaz\u0131\u015fma politikalar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirdi ve art\u0131k t\u00fcm mesajlar\u0131n varsay\u0131lan olarak saklanmas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu hale getirdi. Dava s\u00fcrecindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar art\u0131k sohbet ge\u00e7mi\u015fini kapatam\u0131yor. Ancak eski al\u0131\u015fkanl\u0131klar kolay kolay b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131yor. \u015eirket i\u00e7inde baz\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar Meta&#8217;n\u0131n g\u00fcvenli mesajla\u015fma uygulamas\u0131 WhatsApp&#8217;ta gizlice ileti\u015fim kurmaya devam etti.<\/p>\n<p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak Google i\u00e7in antitr\u00f6st davalar\u0131 ve m\u00fccadelesi daha yeni ba\u015fl\u0131yor. Firman\u0131n \u201ctekel\u201d olarak nitelendirilmesinin ard\u0131ndan 2025 y\u0131l\u0131 boyunca bir dizi dava olacak. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise Google\u2019\u0131 par\u00e7alamak niyetinde. Chrome\u2019un sat\u0131lmas\u0131 ve Arama\u2019da k\u00f6kl\u00fc de\u011fi\u015fikliklerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda yer al\u0131yor.<\/p>\n\n<p>Kaynak\u00a0 :\u00a0<span style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 249, 236); color: rgb(55, 58, 60); font-size: 14px;\">https:\/\/www.donanimhaber.com\/google-davalardan-kacinmak-icin-sistematik-olarak-delil-yok-etti&#8211;184413<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Teknoloji devi Google, son 15 y\u0131lda \u015firket i\u00e7i ileti\u015fimde bir \u201csilme\u201d k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc olu\u015fturarak yasal risklerden ka\u00e7\u0131nmay\u0131 hedefleyen bir strateji benimsedi. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na mesajlar\u0131n\u0131 yok etmeyi, belirli kelimelerden ka\u00e7\u0131nmay\u0131 ve avukatlar\u0131 &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":116206,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[1118,1406,400,155,5083],"class_list":["post-116205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-teknoloji","tag-belge","tag-dava","tag-google","tag-sirket","tag-yasal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116205"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":116212,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116205\/revisions\/116212"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/116206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}