San\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 K\u0131rklareli 2’nci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen 2’nci duru\u015fmada mahkeme, san\u0131k B\u00fclent Bayrak’\u0131n tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na, olay yerine olu\u015fturulacak bilirki\u015fi heyeti ile ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verdi. Karar \u00fczerine b\u00f6lgede 28 Haziran’da olu\u015fturulan bilirki\u015fi heyeti taraf\u0131ndan ke\u015fif yap\u0131ld\u0131. Bilirki\u015fi heyetinde yer alan \u0130stanbul Teknik \u00dcniversitesi’nden in\u015faat m\u00fchendisi-mimar Do\u00e7. Dr. \u0130smail Dabanl\u0131, meteoroloji m\u00fchendisi Do\u00e7. Dr. El\u00e7in Tan, in\u015faat m\u00fchendisi Dr. \u00d6\u011fretim \u00dcyesi H. Emre Al\u00e7i\u00e7ek ve jeoloji m\u00fchendisi Dr. Orhan Yavuz’un haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 rapor mahkemeye sunuldu. Olay yerinin krokileri ve foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 21 sayfal\u0131k raporda, tutuklu san\u0131k B\u00fclent Bayrak, tutuksuz yarg\u0131lanan Cenan Ayd\u0131n, B\u00fc\u015fra G\u00f6kg\u00f6z, \u0130l \u00d6zel \u0130daresi ve DS\u0130, ‘asli kusurlu’, Sevcan Ulut\u00fcrk ise ‘kusursuz’ bulundu.<\/p>\n
Raporda, yap\u0131lar i\u00e7in K\u0131rklareli Valili\u011fi’nin Tar\u0131m ve Orman Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na ba\u015fvurusunda bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n olumsuz g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f verdi\u011fi ve imar plan s\u00fcrecinin sona erdi\u011fi belirtilerek, b\u00fct\u00fcn ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi kaydedildi. Y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen in\u015faatlar\u0131nda ruhsats\u0131z olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, turizm ama\u00e7l\u0131 yap\u0131lar\u0131n in\u015faat ruhsat\u0131 ve yap\u0131 kullan\u0131m izni belgesine ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/6-kisiye-mezar-oldu-sisli-vadi-davasinda-bilirkisi-raporundaki-sok-detay-0-N45aFvwg.jpg\"\/)
<\/img><\/div>\n<\/div>\n‘METEOROLOJ\u0130 UYARDI’<\/strong><\/p>\n Olay g\u00fcnk\u00fc meteorolojik de\u011ferlendirmeye yer verilen raporda, Meteoroloji Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn Trakya B\u00f6lgesi i\u00e7in olas\u0131 can ve mal kayb\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in sar\u0131 renkli uyar\u0131 verdi\u011fi belirtilerek, “A\u015f\u0131r\u0131 ya\u011f\u0131\u015f limiti olan 12 saate 10 milimetrenin \u00fczerinde ya\u011f\u0131\u015f kaydedilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 sebebiyle olay\u0131n a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 ya\u011f\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve do\u011fal afet olarak nitelendirilebilece\u011fi hususunda fikir birli\u011fi sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Meteoroloji Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (MGM) olay \u00f6ncesinde sar\u0131 tehlike koduyla T\u00fcrkiye genelinde uyar\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla AFAD’\u0131n teyakkuzda olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli uyar\u0131n\u0131n MGM taraf\u0131ndan verildi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir” denildi.<\/p>\n ‘DERE TA\u015eMAYA BA\u015eLADI\u011eI ANDAN \u0130T\u0130BAREN P\u0130K DEB\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dcLD\u00dc’<\/strong><\/p>\n Ya\u011f\u0131\u015fta, Sisli Vadi’de g\u00f6r\u00fclen debinin k\u0131sa s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde y\u00fckseldi\u011fi belirtilerek, “Ya\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131n uzun s\u00fcre devam etmesinden dolay\u0131 zeminin doygunlu\u011fa ula\u015fmas\u0131, havza e\u011fiminin y\u00fcksek olmas\u0131 ve ya\u011f\u0131\u015f \u015fiddetinin afet boyutunda olmas\u0131na ba\u011flanabilir. Bu y\u00fczden dere ta\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 andan itibaren k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra pik debi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Palab\u0131y\u0131k Deresi’nin havzas\u0131n\u0131n hemen hemen tamam\u0131 yo\u011fun ormanl\u0131k alanlardan olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla akarsu kesitinde sel an\u0131nda dere kenar\u0131na yak\u0131n a\u011fa\u00e7lar\u0131n k\u00f6klerinden s\u00f6k\u00fclmesi, yama\u00e7larda bulunan kuru dal ve k\u00fct\u00fcklerin dere yata\u011f\u0131na ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 beklenen bir durumdur. Afet boyutunda ya\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131n meydana getirdi\u011fi selin bu kadar yo\u011fun r\u00fcsubat ve tomruk ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131, selin verdi\u011fi zararlar\u0131 katlay\u0131c\u0131 etkisi olmu\u015ftur. Dar bir vadiden y\u00fcksek h\u0131zla gelen selin Sisli Vadi ismiyle bilinen ta\u015fk\u0131n ovas\u0131na geldi\u011finde kesit geni\u015fledi\u011finden h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 azaltarak t\u00fcm ta\u015fk\u0131n ovas\u0131nda menderesler olu\u015fturarak geli\u015fti\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Bu esnada vadi giri\u015finin y\u00f6n\u00fcne g\u00f6re ana akimin merkezinin \u00f6nce sa\u011f sahilden yans\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonra sol sahile y\u00f6nlenip tekrar sa\u011f sahile do\u011fru yans\u0131d\u0131ktan hemen sonra turizm ama\u00e7l\u0131 kullan\u0131lan yap\u0131lara ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re 180 parsel \u00fczerindeki \u00e7iftlik yap\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fchendislik hizmeti alm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131ndan kaynakl\u0131 ayakta kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, selin ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 r\u00fcsubat\u0131n bu yap\u0131lara tak\u0131lmas\u0131yla selin merkezinin bu noktada 2 kola ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, su izlerinden ve olay sonras\u0131 video ve foto\u011fraflardan anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Sa\u011f ve sol sahillere \u00e7arp\u0131p yans\u0131yan 2 ak\u0131m\u0131n ana kollar\u0131 hafif \u00e7elik iskeletli ah\u015fap ve ta\u015f kaplama binalar\u0131 tamamen y\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir” denildi.<\/p>\n ‘DS\u0130’N\u0130N G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc H\u00dcK\u00dcMS\u00dcZ KALMI\u015eTIR’<\/strong><\/p>\n Raporda, DS\u0130 taraf\u0131ndan dere \u015fevinden itibaren 10 metre mesafede ve 1,5 metre bu basman kotundan yap\u0131lar\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc imar plan\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f olarak verildi\u011fi belirtilerek, “Ruhsat s\u00fcreci akim kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. DS\u0130’nin bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc de dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna ra\u011fmen ruhsats\u0131z olarak yap\u0131lar\u0131n DS\u0130 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne tam olarak uygun yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Yerinde yap\u0131lan ke\u015fif sonucu tespit edilen su alma yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n su tutma haznesi olmayan tabandan su alma yap\u0131s\u0131 olan trol tipi su alma yap\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir” ifadeleri kullan\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n ‘TA\u015eKININ ARTI\u015eINA DA\u0130R KANIT BULUNAMADI’<\/strong><\/p>\n Duru\u015fmalarda, san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n derenin \u00fcst k\u0131sm\u0131nda su toplanan bir set oldu\u011fu ve setin y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131yla sular\u0131n aniden geldi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftu. Bilirki\u015fi raporunda ise b\u00f6yle bir sete rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi. Raporda, dere kesitinin t\u0131kan\u0131p, suyun kabarmas\u0131na sebep olacak herhangi bir do\u011fal veya yapay bir sete rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, “Su izlerinden de anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere olay g\u00fcn\u00fc sel dere yata\u011f\u0131ndan ola\u011fan seklinde olduk\u00e7a da yo\u011fun r\u00fcsubat ta\u015f\u0131yarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ne su alma yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ne de memba taraf\u0131nda bulunan kesitlerin t\u0131kan\u0131p arkas\u0131nda su biriktirerek ta\u015fk\u0131n debisini artt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir kan\u0131t bulunamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r” denildi.<\/p>\n ‘BA\u015eKA KONUMDA KULLANILMA SAKINCALI’<\/strong><\/p>\n Yap\u0131sal de\u011ferlendirmeye yer verilen raporda, yap\u0131larla ilgili statik bir proje bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilerek, “Yap\u0131lar\u0131n ruhsats\u0131z bir \u015fekilde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yap\u0131m a\u015famas\u0131nda fenni bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Yap\u0131lar ile ilgili herhangi bir m\u00fchendislik \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n teyit edilmesi amac\u0131yla ke\u015fif mahallinde B\u00fclent Bayrak’a yap\u0131lar\u0131n statik projelerinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131larla ilgili herhangi bir statik \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, template (haz\u0131r\/tip) projelerin kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 heyetimiz belirtmi\u015ftir. Ancak dava dosyas\u0131nda tip proje de olsa yap\u0131lar ile ilgili herhangi bir projeye rastlan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca her b\u00f6lge farkl\u0131 karakteristiklere sahip oldu\u011fundan yap\u0131ya etki edecek y\u00fckler her b\u00f6lgede farkl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, template (tip) projelerin oldu\u011fu gibi ba\u015fka bir konumda kullan\u0131lma sak\u0131ncal\u0131d\u0131r. Yap\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 konumun karakteristiklerine g\u00f6re projenin kontrol edilmesi, gerekli ise revizyonlar\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ondan sonra uygulanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir” diye belirtildi.<\/p>\n TESP\u0130T ED\u0130LEN HUSUSLAR<\/strong><\/p>\n Raporda, ke\u015fif alan\u0131nda yer alan kal\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n incelendi\u011fi belirtilerek, tespit edilen hususlar \u015f\u00f6yle s\u0131raland\u0131:<\/p>\n “Bungalov evlerin taban k\u0131sm\u0131nda bulunan ta\u015f y\u00fckseltme duvarlar\u0131nda yap\u0131sal stabilitenin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken yatay ve d\u00fc\u015fey hat\u0131llar\u0131n (konstr\u00fcktif olarak kullan\u0131lan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck boyutlarda kolon ve kiri\u015fler) kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bungalov ev zeminlerinin ta\u015f duvar \u00fcst kotundan ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131larda zemin betonu, ta\u015f duvar \u00fcst kotu ile ayni hizada ve toprak-tas dolgu zerine donat\u0131s\u0131z beton olarak d\u00f6k\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ancak bu d\u00f6\u015femenin, \u00fczerine gelen y\u00fckler dikkate al\u0131narak donat\u0131 olarak tasarlanmas\u0131 ve d\u00f6\u015feme betonunun ta\u015f duvar \u00fcst\u00fcnde yap\u0131lacak yatay hat\u0131l ile birlikte monolitik olarak d\u00f6k\u00fclmesi gerekmektedir. \u00dcst yap\u0131lar\u0131n mesnetlenmesi (zemine ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131) ta\u015f duvar \u00fczerine d\u00f6k\u00fclen ince bir beton tabakas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ke\u015fif alan\u0131nda al\u0131nan beyanlardan da teyit edildi\u011fi gibi imalat s\u0131ras\u0131nda bu betonun i\u00e7inde donat\u0131 demirleri b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve sonras\u0131nda \u00fcst yap\u0131 bu donat\u0131lar vas\u0131tas\u0131yla ta\u015f duvar \u00fczerine mesnetlendirilmi\u015ftir. Yerinde yap\u0131lan g\u00f6zlemde ankraj ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n az say\u0131da oldu\u011fu, g\u00f6mme derinliklerinin yetersiz oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr Ayr\u0131ca donat\u0131 demirine somun tak\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan \u00fcst yap\u0131 elemanlar\u0131na ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n punto kaynakla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tahmin edilmektedir. Bungalov-zemin ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131nda y\u00f6netmelikler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yeterli say\u0131da, yeterli \u00e7apta, yeterli g\u00f6mme derinli\u011fine sahip ankraj \u00e7ubuklar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Nitekim yerinde incelemede ankraj olarak kullan\u0131lan donat\u0131 \u00e7ubuklar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda g\u00f6\u00e7me g\u00f6zlemlenmi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak davaya konu yap\u0131lar\u0131n m\u00fchendislik hizmeti almam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, proje ve hesap raporlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tasar\u0131m a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yerinde inceleme ile ke\u015fif mahallinde yap\u0131lan g\u00f6zlemlerle yap\u0131larda uygulama a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da yukar\u0131da bahsedilen problemler tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ancak unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r ki yap\u0131n\u0131n projelendirilmesi esnas\u0131nda fen ve sanat kurallar\u0131na uygun tasar\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131, yap\u0131da can kayb\u0131 riskine ihtimal vermeyecek \u015fekilde projelendirilme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Konut, i\u015f yeri vs. gibi yap\u0131lar\u0131n ta\u015fk\u0131n, heyelan ve kaya d\u00fc\u015fmesi gibi afet riski olan, s\u0131hhi ve jeolojik a\u00e7\u0131dan \u00fczerinde yap\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda mahzur bulunan alanlarda yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 esas oldu\u011fundan normal \u015fartlarda bu tip yap\u0131lar\u0131n projelendirilmesinde deprem, r\u00fczgar, kar, s\u0131cakl\u0131k de\u011fi\u015fimi gibi etkiler dikkate al\u0131nmakla birlikte herhangi bir sel etkisi dikkate al\u0131nmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu yap\u0131lar\u0131n tasar\u0131m\u0131nda ve uygulanmas\u0131nda m\u00fchendislik hizmeti al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olsa dahi ta\u015fk\u0131n ve sel riski g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edildi\u011finden bu durumda da yap\u0131lar\u0131n sel etkisi ile g\u00f6\u00e7me olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir” denildi.<\/p>\n 3 SANIK \u0130LE DS\u0130 VE \u00d6ZEL \u0130DARE KUSURLU BULUNDU<\/strong><\/p>\n Raporda, ruhsats\u0131z olarak yap\u0131lan yap\u0131lar\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun selden zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n tamamen y\u0131k\u0131larak can kayb\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi. Raporda, “Davaya konu yap\u0131lar\u0131n herhangi bir m\u00fchendislik hizmeti almadan, ruhsats\u0131z bir \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve turizm tesisi olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan fiili olarak sorumlu olan san\u0131k B\u00fclent Bayrak’\u0131n, asli kusurlu oldu\u011fu” denildi. \u015eirketin y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyesi ve ba\u015fkan\u0131 olan Cenan Ayd\u0131n’\u0131n ka\u00e7ak yap\u0131lara ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu nedenle asli kusurlu bulundu. Ka\u00e7ak yap\u0131lar\u0131n turizm tesisi olarak i\u015fletildi\u011fi zamana denk gelen \u015firketin y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyesi ve ba\u015fkan\u0131 olan B\u00fc\u015fra G\u00f6ks\u00f6z de asli kusurlu bulundu.<\/p>\n Raporda \u00d6zel \u0130daresi ve DS\u0130’nin de asli kusurlu bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek, “\u0130l \u00d6zel \u0130daresi taraf\u0131ndan ka\u00e7ak yap\u0131lar tespit edilip m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesine ra\u011fmen mevzuatta a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131l\u0131 olan ka\u00e7ak yap\u0131 sahiplerine mevzuat\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u00fcrede y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131 tebli\u011f etmeyen, davalar\u0131n sadece para cezalar\u0131na ait oldu\u011fundan y\u0131k\u0131m kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 herhangi bir idari dava da a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan beklenecek bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, ka\u00e7ak yap\u0131lar\u0131n sahibi taraf\u0131ndan y\u0131k\u0131lmamas\u0131 sonucu s\u00fcreci takip edip ka\u00e7ak yap\u0131lar y\u0131kt\u0131rmaktan sorumlu oldu\u011fu halde y\u0131k\u0131m i\u015flemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00d6zel \u0130daresi’nin asli kusurlu, 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Ta\u015fk\u0131n ev R\u00fcsubat Kontrol\u00fc Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi 14’\u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi gere\u011fi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zaruri olan hidrolojik ve hidrolik et\u00fct raporu ve ta\u015fk\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 belirleme \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131ndan yap\u0131la\u015fma i\u00e7in DS\u0130’nin uygun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f vermesi gerekirken; 180 parsel \u00fczerindeki tar\u0131msal ama\u00e7l\u0131 yap\u0131lar yap\u0131l\u0131rken 19.08.2020 ve ‘Turizm Alan\u0131’ ama\u00e7l\u0131 1\/5000 Naz\u0131m \u0130mar Plan\u0131 ve 1\/1000 Uygulama \u0130mar Plan yap\u0131labilmesi yap\u0131lar\u0131n imar plan s\u00fcrecinde 184-185 nolu parseller i\u00e7in 03.11.2020 tarihli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131lar\u0131nda, ‘Dere \u015fev \u00fcst\u00fcnden itibaren 10,00 metre yakla\u015fma mesafesi b\u0131rak\u0131lmal\u0131, b\u0131rak\u0131lan bu alana herhangi bir tesis in\u015fa edilmemelidir’ g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f gere\u011fi yap\u0131la\u015fman\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 14’\u00fcnc\u00fc maddesine uyuldu\u011funa dair dosya m\u00fcnderecat\u0131nda bir delil mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ta\u015fk\u0131n olay\u0131n ya\u015fanmas\u0131nda Devlet Su \u0130\u015fleri’nin (DS\u0130) asli kusurlu oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r” ifadeleri kullan\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n Kaynak :\u00a0http:\/\/www.milliyet.com.tr\/gundem\/6-kisiye-mezar-oldu-sisli-vadi-davasinda-bilirkisi-raporundaki-sok-detay-7160803<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" K\u0131rklareli \u0130\u011fneada beldesinde ge\u00e7en y\u0131l meydana gelen sel felaketinde ‘Sisli Vadi’ bungalov evlerinde tatil yapan 6 ki\u015finin \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olayda, mahkeme karar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ke\u015ffin bilirki\u015fi raporunda, tutuklu B\u00fclent Bayrak, tutuksuz yarg\u0131lanan Cenan Ayd\u0131n, B\u00fc\u015fra G\u00f6kg\u00f6z, \u0130l \u00d6zel \u0130daresi ve DS\u0130, ‘asli kusurlu’ bulundu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":122862,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[3609,2288,193,524,6902],"class_list":["post-122861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guncel","tag-dere","tag-rapor","tag-sel","tag-yapi","tag-yapilar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122861"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":122865,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122861\/revisions\/122865"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/122862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![](\"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/6-kisiye-mezar-oldu-sisli-vadi-davasinda-bilirkisi-raporundaki-sok-detay-1-DwiDhfXb.jpg\"\/)
<\/img><\/div>\n<\/div>\n