{"id":132645,"date":"2025-10-27T12:12:10","date_gmt":"2025-10-27T12:12:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/?p=132645"},"modified":"2025-10-27T12:12:10","modified_gmt":"2025-10-27T12:12:10","slug":"30-yillik-evlilik-bir-imza-yuzunden-yok-sayilmisti-aymden-dikkat-ceken-karar-geldi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/2025\/10\/27\/30-yillik-evlilik-bir-imza-yuzunden-yok-sayilmisti-aymden-dikkat-ceken-karar-geldi\/","title":{"rendered":"30 y\u0131ll\u0131k evlilik Bir imza y\u00fcz\u00fcnden &#8216;yok&#8217; say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131! AYM\u2019den dikkat \u00e7eken karar geldi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Anayasa Mahkemesi (AYM), evlendikten sonra Almanya&#8217;ya giden ve burada 3 \u00e7ocuk sahibi olan \u00e7iftin T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;deki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda, taraflardan birinin imzas\u0131n\u0131n ilgili ki\u015fiye ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle &#8220;evlili\u011fin yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131&#8221; aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali kabul etti.<\/p>\n<p>Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yer alan karara g\u00f6re, E.D. ile 1989&#8217;da T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;de evlenen ve Almanya&#8217;da ya\u015fayan H.D, 2013&#8217;te Almanya&#8217;da bo\u015fanma ve mal rejiminin tasfiyesi talepli dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Dava devam ederken E.D de 2013&#8217;te T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;de &#8220;evlili\u011fin yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde oldu\u011funun tespiti&#8221; i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u201cEVL\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130N YOK H\u00dcKM\u00dcNDE\u201d DED\u0130LER, AYM\u2019DEN YEN\u0130 KARAR GELD\u0130 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>H.D, dava kapsam\u0131nda, E.D&#8217;nin Almanya&#8217;da evli ve \u00e7ocuklu olmas\u0131n\u0131n getirdi\u011fi t\u00fcm vergi ve sigorta kolayl\u0131klar\u0131ndan yararland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcrken mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131na gelindi\u011finde dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kurallar\u0131na uygun hareket etmedi\u011fini savundu.<\/p>\n<p>Dava kapsam\u0131nda ki\u015filerin yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile evlilik belgelerindeki imzalar\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen mahkeme, evlilik belgesinde yer alan imzan\u0131n E.D&#8217;ye ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederek, evlili\u011fin yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde oldu\u011funa karar verdi.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine H.D, hak ihlali iddias\u0131yla AYM&#8217;ye bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fvuruyu inceleyen Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine h\u00fckmederek, ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ad\u0131na karar \u00f6rne\u011finin ilgili mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesini kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>KARARIN GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130NDEN <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>AYM&#8217;nin karar\u0131nda, \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenlemenin, &#8220;resmi makamlar\u0131n \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na m\u00fcdahale edememesi&#8221; ile &#8220;ki\u015finin ferdi ve aile hayat\u0131n\u0131 kendi anlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi d\u00fczenleyip ya\u015fayabilmesi&#8221;ni i\u00e7erdi\u011fi vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri bulundu\u011fu aktar\u0131lan kararda, ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda mahkemenin, evlenme k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki imzan\u0131n taraflardan birisine ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespiti nedeniyle karar verdi\u011fi ancak nikah s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunan tan\u0131klar ile d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn davetiyesi ve foto\u011fraflara ili\u015fkin ise de\u011ferlendirme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edildi.<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar\u0131n evlendikten sonra Almanya&#8217;ya gitti\u011fi ve evlilikten 3 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fcnyaya geldi\u011fi, evlilikle ilgili vergi muafiyeti gibi d\u00fczenlemelerden de faydaland\u0131klar\u0131 aktar\u0131lan kararda, yerel mahkemenin bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmemesi nedeniyle &#8220;\u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmedi\u011fi&#8221; ifade edildi.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemenin karar\u0131 nedeniyle &#8220;aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131&#8221; kapsam\u0131nda pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin gere\u011fi gibi yerine getirilmedi\u011fi kaydedilen kararda, &#8220;Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.&#8221; de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Kaynak :\u00a0<span style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 249, 236); color: rgb(55, 58, 60); font-size: 14px;\">http:\/\/www.milliyet.com.tr\/gundem\/30-yillik-evlilik-bir-imza-yuzunden-yok-sayilmisti-aymden-dikkat-ceken-karar-geldi-7472062<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nden dikkat \u00e7eken bir karar geldi. Almanya\u2019da ya\u015fayan, 3 \u00e7ocuk sahibi bir \u00e7iftin T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda, \u201cimza bana ait de\u011fil\u201d iddias\u0131yla evlili\u011fin yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015fti. Ancak AYM bu karar\u0131 aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali sayd\u0131. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, \u201cTan\u0131klar, d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn foto\u011fraflar\u0131, hatta \u00e7ocuklar var.  Bu evlilik yok say\u0131lamaz\u201d diyerek dosyay\u0131 yeniden de\u011ferlendirilmek \u00fczere yerel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":132646,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[1406,8878,6211,578],"class_list":["post-132645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guncel","tag-dava","tag-evli","tag-ihlal","tag-karar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132645"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132645\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":132647,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132645\/revisions\/132647"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/132646"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}