{"id":136843,"date":"2025-11-03T09:24:10","date_gmt":"2025-11-03T09:24:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/?p=136843"},"modified":"2025-11-03T09:24:10","modified_gmt":"2025-11-03T09:24:10","slug":"20-yildir-bitmeyen-dava-400-durusma-goruldu-ama-sonuc-alamadi-bir-kisi-hem-akilli-hem-deli-olamaz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/2025\/11\/03\/20-yildir-bitmeyen-dava-400-durusma-goruldu-ama-sonuc-alamadi-bir-kisi-hem-akilli-hem-deli-olamaz\/","title":{"rendered":"20 y\u0131ld\u0131r bitmeyen dava! 400 duru\u015fma g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc ama sonu\u00e7 alamad\u0131 \u2018Bir ki\u015fi hem ak\u0131ll\u0131 hem deli olamaz"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kentte ya\u015fayan Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n, 26 y\u0131l \u00f6nce C.\u00c7. ile evlendi. \u00c7iftin 2001 y\u0131l\u0131nda erkek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 d\u00fcnyaya geldi. Y\u0131llar sonra aile i\u00e7inde ya\u015fanan gayrimenkul anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7iftin evlilik birli\u011fine zarar verdi. M\u00fclk tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 s\u00fcrerken, C.\u00c7. ya\u015fananlar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan evi terk etti. \u00c7ift, 2014’te bo\u015fand\u0131. Ancak dava devam ederken, 2007’de C.\u00c7. ad\u0131na ‘Ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir’ raporu al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Yal\u00e7\u0131n ve avukat\u0131, \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu’ndan C.\u00c7.’nin ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin resmi rapor talep etti. Kurum, 2018’de C.\u00c7.’nin ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin rapor d\u00fczenledi. Ard\u0131ndan 2019’da mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

2025 y\u0131l\u0131 itibar\u0131yla \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 4’\u00fcnc\u00fc \u0130htisas Dairesi, C.\u00c7.’nin do\u011fu\u015ftan ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin rapor verdi. B\u00f6lge istinaf mahkemesi, adli t\u0131p raporu ile ilk al\u0131nan raporlar aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmesi gerekti\u011fine karar verince daha \u00f6nceki kararlar bozuldu. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu\u2019nda yeniden muayene edilen C.\u00c7.’nin, ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011fu ikinci kez tescil edildi. Ancak yerel mahkeme, yeni raporlar ve istinaf karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n\u2019\u0131n maddi manevi tazminat talebini reddetti. Karara itiraz eden Yal\u00e7\u0131n, Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n

\u2018YAL\u00c7IN LEH\u0130NE SUNULAN DEL\u0130LLER D\u0130KKATE ALINMAMI\u015eTI\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 Musa Ba\u015f, \u201cMahkeme, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi davas\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti ancak kabul m\u00fc edildi, ret mi edildi belli de\u011fil. 2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda Akdeniz \u00dcniversitesi ile Manisa Ruh ve Sinir Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Hastanesi\u2019nden al\u0131nan raporlarda, m\u00fcvekkilin eski e\u015fi C.\u00c7.\u2019nin \u2018Ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019 belirtilmi\u015f, bu rapor do\u011frultusunda kendisi k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde de bu k\u0131s\u0131tlama dayanak al\u0131narak, Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n lehine sunulan deliller dikkate al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Gerek\u00e7e olarak ise \u2018Ak\u0131l hastas\u0131n\u0131n bir kusuru olamaz\u2019 denildi. Bu nedenle m\u00fcvekkilim bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti ve e\u015fine tazminat \u00f6demek zorunda kald\u0131” dedi.<\/p>\n

\u2018B\u0130R K\u0130\u015e\u0130 HEM \u2018AKILLI\u2019 HEM \u2018DEL\u0130\u2019 OLAMAZ\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

Raporlara ra\u011fmen davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fini ifade eden Avukat Ba\u015f, \u201c2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u015fahs\u0131n yeniden ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kavu\u015ftu\u011funa dair tespit yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine biz de davaya m\u00fcdahil olduk. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bir ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 anda hem \u2018ak\u0131ll\u0131\u2019 hem \u2018deli\u2019 olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek yarg\u0131laman\u0131n iadesini talep ettik. Mahkeme dosyay\u0131 \u00f6nce \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 4\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc \u0130htisas Dairesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderdi. Bu daire, \u2018Ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerindedir\u2019 dedi. Ancak buna ra\u011fmen mahkeme davay\u0131 reddetti. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi ise raporlar\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011funa dikkati \u00e7ekerek dosyan\u0131n Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Genel Kurulu\u2019na g\u00f6nderilmesine h\u00fckmetti” ifadelerini kulland\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u2018DOSYAMIZ \u0130ST\u0130NAF A\u015eAMASINDA\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nan son rapora g\u00f6re C.\u00c7.\u2019nin hi\u00e7bir zaman akli dengesini kaybetmedi\u011fini belirten Musa Ba\u015f, \u201cBu ki\u015finin hi\u00e7bir d\u00f6nemde ak\u0131l hastas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 2006-2007 y\u0131llar\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen raporlar\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve IQ\u2019sunun 92 oldu\u011fu belirtildi. Buna ra\u011fmen yerel mahkeme, m\u00fcvekkili yeniden Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 10\u2019uncu \u0130htisas Dairesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderdi. Buradan da \u2018ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u2019 dair ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde rapor geldi. Biz art\u0131k bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda kusur durumunun bu yeni tespitler do\u011frultusunda yeniden de\u011ferlendirilmesini beklerken, mahkeme trajikomik bir \u015fekilde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verip, eski karar\u0131 neredeyse birebir \u015fekilde tekrar verdi. \u015eu anda dosyam\u0131z istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda” diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

\u2018H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R HUKUK\u0130 VEYA \u0130DAR\u0130 \u0130\u015eLEM BA\u015eLATILMADI\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ba\u015f, s\u00fcrecin bir aile davas\u0131 olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayarak, \u201cBir hukuk\u00e7u olarak beni en \u00e7ok rahats\u0131z eden konu, 2007\u2019de verilen o ilk raporlar\u0131n sahte oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, bu raporlar\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen kurum ve doktorlar hakk\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir hukuki veya idari i\u015flem ba\u015flat\u0131lmad\u0131. M\u00fcvekkilim 20 y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n s\u00fcredir ciddi bir hak kayb\u0131na u\u011fram\u0131\u015f durumda ancak bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te sorumlular\u0131n tamam\u0131 g\u00f6revine devam ediyor. Bu durum hem adalet duygusunu hem de hukuk g\u00fcvenli\u011fini zedeliyor” dedi.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u2018KEND\u0130 KARARINI REDDEDEN B\u0130R MAHKEME\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

20 y\u0131ld\u0131r devam eden duru\u015fmalardan dolay\u0131 y\u0131prand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade eden Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n ise \u201cBozma karar\u0131n\u0131 veren \u00fcst mahkeme bu kez davay\u0131 esastan reddetti. Yani ayn\u0131 mahkeme hem karar\u0131 bozuyor hem de kendi verdi\u011fi eski karar\u0131n\u0131 reddediyor. Ger\u00e7ekten \u00e7ok \u00e7eli\u015fkili bir durum. \u015eu anda tekrar Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a ba\u015fvurduk. Kendi karar\u0131n\u0131 reddeden bir mahkemeden bahsediyoruz. Dosya numaralar\u0131 s\u00fcrekli de\u011fi\u015fiyor, sanki sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir irade var gibi. Art\u0131k bu davan\u0131n sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fil, sadece adaletin yerini bulmas\u0131n\u0131 istiyorum” ifadelerini kulland\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u2018HEM O\u011eLUMUN HEM BEN\u0130M GEN\u00c7L\u0130\u011e\u0130M\u0130 ALDILAR\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yal\u00e7\u0131n, ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreci \u015fu s\u00f6zlerle \u00f6zetledi:<\/p>\n

\u201c2006\u2019dan 2025\u2019e kadar sonu\u00e7lanmayan, defalarca dosya numaras\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fen, esastan ret, usulden ret, kabul ama yar\u0131m kabul \u015feklinde gidip gelen bu dosyalara Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istiyorum. O\u011flum o d\u00f6nem 4 ya\u015f\u0131ndayd\u0131, \u015fimdi 24 ya\u015f\u0131na girecek. Hem onun gen\u00e7li\u011fini ald\u0131lar hem benim gen\u00e7li\u011fimi. Ama herkes hayat\u0131na devam etti. Avukat\u0131m\u0131n da dedi\u011fi gibi, as\u0131l sorun ceza mahkemelerinin hi\u00e7 i\u015flememesi. Bu durum kamu d\u00fczenini ilgilendiriyor.”<\/p>\n\n

<\/p>\n

Kaynak :\u00a0http:\/\/www.milliyet.com.tr\/gundem\/20-yildir-bitmeyen-dava-400-durusma-goruldu-ama-sonuc-alamadi-bir-kisi-hem-akilli-hem-deli-olamaz-7476020<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Antalya\u2019da Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n (52), eski e\u015fi C.\u00c7.\u2019ye kar\u015f\u0131 2006\u2019dan bu yana s\u00fcren hukuk m\u00fccadelesinde 20 y\u0131ld\u0131r sonu\u00e7 alamad\u0131. 400\u2019\u00fc a\u015fk\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcrken, C.\u00c7.\u2019nin akli dengesinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair rapor al\u0131nd\u0131. \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu\u2019nun haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 raporlar ise C.\u00c7.\u2019nin ak\u0131l hastas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koydu. Yerel mahkemenin mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ve maddi manevi tazminat taleplerini reddetti\u011fi Yal\u00e7\u0131n, dosyay\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":136844,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[9193,1406,578,446,2288],"class_list":["post-136843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guncel","tag-akil","tag-dava","tag-karar","tag-mahkeme","tag-rapor"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136843"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136843\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":136846,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136843\/revisions\/136846"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/136844"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}