{"id":157169,"date":"2025-12-25T08:54:54","date_gmt":"2025-12-25T08:54:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/?p=157169"},"modified":"2025-12-25T08:54:54","modified_gmt":"2025-12-25T08:54:54","slug":"6-milyar-dolarlik-arazi-davasinda-yeni-gelisme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/2025\/12\/25\/6-milyar-dolarlik-arazi-davasinda-yeni-gelisme\/","title":{"rendered":"6 milyar dolarl\u0131k arazi davas\u0131nda yeni geli\u015fme"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Antalya 1&#8217;inci Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi, kentin en de\u011ferli parklar\u0131, kamu binalar\u0131, 5 y\u0131ld\u0131zl\u0131 otelleri, spor tesisleri ve 10 bin civar\u0131nda konutun bulundu\u011fu Meltem ve Bah\u00e7elievler mahalleleri ile Konyaalt\u0131 Beach Park&#8217;\u0131 kapsayan, bug\u00fcnk\u00fc de\u011feri 6 milyar dolar\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n 2 milyon 400 bin metrekare araziyle ilgili, Arap S\u00fcleyman, Hac\u0131 Bekirzade Mehmet A\u011fa ve Hazine olmak \u00fczere, \u00fc\u00e7 ana hissedar miras\u00e7\u0131 oldu\u011funa karar verdi. 2006 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki karar sonras\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan yeni miras\u00e7\u0131 iddialar\u0131 ve bu kapsamda mahkemelerin tedbir kararlar\u0131 nedeniyle dava \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulamad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>BAM&#8217;DAN GELD\u0130, BAM&#8217;A GER\u0130 G\u0130TT\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Davada son olarak Antalya Kadastro Mahkemesi&#8217;nin Arap S\u00fcleyman&#8217;\u0131n k\u0131z\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen Ay\u015fe y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 2024 y\u0131l\u0131nda verdi\u011fi tedbir, itiraz sonucunda Hac\u0131 Bekirzade miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden BAM 8&#8217;inci Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Hac\u0131 Bekirzade&#8217;nin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia eden ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan tedbir ba\u015fvurusuna Antalya Kadastro Mahkemesi ret karar\u0131 verince, bu ki\u015finin itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine dosya BAM&#8217;a g\u00f6nderildi. Antalya Kadastro Mahkemesi 17 Aral\u0131k&#8217;taki duru\u015fmada, itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin dosyan\u0131n BAM&#8217;da olmas\u0131 nedeniyle karar alamad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>KAMU B\u0130NALARI, Y\u00dcZLERCE KONUT VE \u0130\u015e YER\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Davaya konu 2,4 milyon metrekarelik alanda; Turizm Uygulama Oteli, Antalya E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesi, Falez ve Rixos otelleri, Cam Piramit Park\u0131, AKM, Atat\u00fcrk K\u00fclt\u00fcr Park\u0131, Cam Piramit Fuar ve Kongre Merkezi, Antalya Tenis \u0130htisas Kul\u00fcb\u00fc, akaryak\u0131t istasyonu, Antalyaspor Tesisleri, Corendon Stadyumu, Antalya Adliyesi, Antalya Spor Salonu, say\u0131s\u0131z sitelerdeki 10 bin civar\u0131nda konut, Meltem Pazar Yeri, tesisler, okullar, parklar, Tapu B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, camiler, yeni adliyeye kadar otoparklar, kooperatifler ve daha bir\u00e7ok yap\u0131 yer al\u0131yor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1847 TAR\u0130HL\u0130 TAPU, 2006&#8217;DA KES\u0130NLE\u015e\u0130YOR<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dava s\u00fcrecinin 1958 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Hac\u0131 Bekirzade Mehmet A\u011fa ve Arap S\u00fcleyman&#8217;\u0131n baz\u0131 miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n avukat\u0131 Necati Y\u0131lmaz, \u201cAsl\u0131nda kadastro tespiti yap\u0131l\u0131yor burayla ilgili ve eski tapulara dayanarak hak sahiplerinin ad\u0131na karar veriyor. O mahalle \u00fczerinde bulunan insanlar dava a\u00e7\u0131yor, &#8216;Asl\u0131nda buras\u0131 bizim&#8217; diye. Devlet de kat\u0131l\u0131yor, &#8216;Buras\u0131 bizim&#8217; diyor. Belediye kat\u0131l\u0131yor, Vak\u0131flar kat\u0131l\u0131yor. Mahkeme 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda karar veriyor. Karar 2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda kesinle\u015fiyor. 3 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda tescil karar\u0131 veriliyor. \u00dc\u00e7 payda\u015f tapu. 1847 tarihli bir tapunun malikleri Arap S\u00fcleyman A\u011fa ya da Hac\u0131 S\u00fcleyman A\u011fa diye de ge\u00e7iyor. Bak\u0131rc\u0131 Yorgi diye bir vatanda\u015f. Miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 bulunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in onun 3&#8217;te 1&#8217;lik pay\u0131 Hazine ad\u0131na tescil oluyor. Ve Hac\u0131 Bekirzade Mehmet A\u011fa miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131na tapuya tescile karar veriliyor. 2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda karar kesinle\u015fiyor ve tescil ediliyor&#8221; diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EL ATILMAYAN 20 D\u00d6N\u00dcM KALMI\u015e<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>48 y\u0131ll\u0131k dava s\u00fcrecinde bu b\u00f6lgeler \u015fehrin oras\u0131nda kal\u0131nca, 1964&#8217;ten itibaren kentteki ihtiya\u00e7lar nedeniyle kamula\u015ft\u0131rmalar oldu\u011funu belirten Avukat Y\u0131lmaz, \u201cTabi yarg\u0131lama devam etti\u011fi i\u00e7in hi\u00e7 kimseye kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedeli \u00f6denmiyor. Tebligatlar \u00e7o\u011funlukla gazeteye ilan yoluyla yap\u0131l\u0131yor. \u00d6lm\u00fc\u015f ki\u015filere tebligatlar yap\u0131l\u0131yor. Yani \u015fu anda yakla\u015f\u0131k 4&#8217;te 1&#8217;i kalm\u0131\u015f durumda. Tapunun 4&#8217;te 3&#8217;\u00fc yap\u0131lan kamula\u015ft\u0131rmalar neticesinde k\u00fct\u00fck de\u011fi\u015ftiriyor. Yani idareler ad\u0131na ge\u00e7iyor. Bunu genellikle Arsa Ofisi \u00fczerinden ve belediyeler de kendi \u00fczerinden yap\u0131yor. Belediyeler sonras\u0131nda \u00e7e\u015fitli kooperatiflere bu arazileri sat\u0131yor. Meltem&#8217;deki kooperatifler, hastane, oteller bu \u015fekilde. Hala ki\u015filer ad\u0131na tapular\u0131 kay\u0131tl\u0131 kalan yakla\u015f\u0131k 600 bin metrekarelik alan s\u00f6z konusu. Bu 600 bin metrekarelik alan i\u00e7erisinde herhangi bir \u015fekilde idarenin el atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131k 20 d\u00f6n\u00fcm kadar yer var. Onlar da Meltem Pazar\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n etraf\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k 30 parselden ibaret. Bunun da 3&#8217;te 1&#8217;i Hazine&#8217;nin, 3&#8217;te 1&#8217;i Hac\u0131 Bekirzade Mehmet A\u011fa miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n, 3&#8217;te 1&#8217;i de Arap S\u00fcleyman A\u011fa miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n&#8221; dedi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>YARGILAMANIN YEN\u0130LENMES\u0130 KARARI<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>2006&#8217;daki tescil karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan 2011&#8217;de yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi davas\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 anlatan Y\u0131lmaz, \u201cBirileri Arap S\u00fcleyman A\u011fa&#8217;n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek, Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nde 2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f. Mahkeme de 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda bir karar vermi\u015f. Fakat kimsenin haberi yok yine. Arap S\u00fcleyman A\u011fa&#8217;n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015f. Fark\u0131na var\u0131l\u0131nca insanlar m\u00fcracaat etti, Yarg\u0131tay bu karar\u0131 bozdu. Usulden dedi ki, &#8216;Davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131 bunlar de\u011fil, herkese davay\u0131 tebli\u011f edin, onlar\u0131n da kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131n, ondan sonra karar verin.&#8217; 2011&#8217;de bu dava hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmeden Kadastro Mahkemesi&#8217;nde yarg\u0131lama iadesine ba\u015fvurdular ve tedbir karar\u0131 istemi\u015fler. Mahkeme de t\u00fcm ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n \u00fczerine tedbir koymu\u015f. Halbuki o an\u0131lan dava, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n iadesi dosyas\u0131, sadece Arap S\u00fcleyman miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n kendi aralar\u0131ndaki paylar\u0131na ili\u015fkin. Hac\u0131 Bekirzade miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 ve Hazine&#8217;yi ilgilendirmiyor&#8221; diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n<p><strong>TEDB\u0130R KARARI \u0130ST\u0130NAFTA KALDIRILDI<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Hazinenin paylar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki tedbirin 2015&#8217;te kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dile getiren Avukat Y\u0131lmaz, \u201cFakat Hac\u0131 Bekirzade miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerindeki tedbir devam ediyor. Bu asl\u0131nda bizim davalar\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7ok engel de\u011fildi. Engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in biz de \u00e7ok ilgilenmedik. Fakat tazminat kararlar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, idareler aras\u0131na tescil karar\u0131 verildi\u011finde, tescil kararlar\u0131 i\u015flenemez oldu tapuya, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc tedbir karar\u0131 vard\u0131. Bu nedenle biz temmuz ay\u0131ndaki duru\u015fmada, tedbirin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedik ve mahkeme de reddetti talebimizi. Dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 olmam\u0131za ra\u011fmen reddetti. Bir mant\u0131k hatas\u0131 var. Bu ki\u015fi e\u011fer dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131ysa bu ki\u015finin mallar\u0131 \u00fczerine niye tedbir konuluyor? Tedbir konulduysa bu ki\u015fi neden dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131? B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8&#8217;inci Hukuk Dairesi Hac\u0131 Bekirzade miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n bu davada taraf olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu davan\u0131n Arap S\u00fcleyman miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n kendi aralar\u0131ndaki dava oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131&#8221; dedi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8216;TARAF&#8217; OLMAYAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N TALEB\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ekim ay\u0131nda Hac\u0131 Bekirzade miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia eden farkl\u0131 ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan Antalya Kadastro Mahkemesi&#8217;ne yeni bir tedbir ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Y\u0131lmaz, davadaki yeni geli\u015fmeyi \u015f\u00f6yle anlatt\u0131:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMahkeme ret karar\u0131 vermi\u015f. Ret karar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar BAM&#8217;a g\u00f6ndermi\u015fler. 17 Aral\u0131k&#8217;taki duru\u015fmada dava dosyas\u0131 yoktu. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc mahkeme tedbir istemenin reddine karar verince istinaf yoluna gitmi\u015f. Asl\u0131nda ret karar\u0131 vermesi de do\u011fru de\u011fildi mahkemenin. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ba\u015fvuru yapan ki\u015fi hen\u00fcz bu davada taraf de\u011fil. Hac\u0131 Bekirzade A\u011fa miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia eden bir \u015fah\u0131s. Bunun m\u00fcdahale talebi kabul edilmi\u015f de\u011fil. M\u00fcdahale talebi kabul edilmeden, yani davada taraf olmadan bu ki\u015finin talebi hakk\u0131nda olumlu, olumsuz bir karar verilmemesi gerekir. Usulen b\u00f6yle bir \u015fey m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fil. Ama mahkeme sehven talebinin reddine karar verince bu arkada\u015flar da tutmu\u015f dosyay\u0131 iki ay \u00f6nce ayn\u0131 konuda karar verildi\u011fi halde tekrar BAM 8&#8217;inci Hukuk Dairesi\u2019ne g\u00f6ndermi\u015fler. Halbuki B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 3 ay \u00f6nce zaten bir karar vermi\u015f. Ayn\u0131 karar\u0131 bir daha oraya g\u00f6ndermenin anlam\u0131 ne? Buradaki ama\u00e7 dosyay\u0131 bir \u015fekilde s\u00fcr\u00fcncemede b\u0131rakmak, kalmas\u0131ndan yararlanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak. \u00c7e\u015fitli insanlar bundan yararlanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor.&#8221; (DHA)<\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Kaynak :\u00a0<span style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 249, 236); color: rgb(55, 58, 60); font-size: 14px;\">http:\/\/www.milliyet.com.tr\/ekonomi\/6-milyar-dolarlik-arazi-davasinda-yeni-gelisme-7509008<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Antalya&#8217;da 6 milyar dolar de\u011ferindeki 2 milyon 400 bin metrekarelik araziye ili\u015fkin davada, istinaf mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan tedbirin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, miras\u00e7\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia eden ba\u015fka bir ki\u015finin ba\u015fvurusu hakk\u0131nda verilen ret karar\u0131, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi&#8217;ne (BAM) ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":157170,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1406,578,446,10482,3381],"class_list":["post-157169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ekonomi","tag-dava","tag-karar","tag-mahkeme","tag-mirasci","tag-tedbir"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157169"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":157171,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157169\/revisions\/157171"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/157170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}