Yarg\u0131tay 2’nci Hukuk Dairesi, bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda evlilik birli\u011fi s\u00fcrerken affedilen veya ho\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fclen davran\u0131\u015flardan kusur \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedip, e\u015finin ailesine so\u011fuk davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131, evden kovdu\u011fu ve ev i\u015fleriyle ilgilenmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7eleriyle kad\u0131n\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu bulan yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu.<\/p>\n
Ankara Bat\u0131 3’\u00fcnc\u00fc Aile Mahkemesi’nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda taraflar, evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 erkek, e\u015finin ailesine so\u011fuk davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve evden kovdu\u011funu, ev i\u015fleriyle ilgilenmedi\u011fini, k\u0131skan\u00e7 davran\u0131\u015flar sergiledi\u011fini ve zaman zaman evi terk etmeye zorlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek bo\u015fanma talebinde bulundu.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 ve kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n ise erke\u011fin kendisine hakaret etti\u011fini, eve ge\u00e7 saatlerde geldi\u011fini ve evlilik birli\u011fini s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmez hale getirdi\u011fini savunarak bo\u015fanman\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra maddi ve manevi tazminat ile yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n
YEREL MAHKEME, KADINI A\u011eIR KUSURLU BULDU<\/strong><\/p>\n Mahkeme, her iki taraf\u0131n bo\u015fanma talebini kabul ederek taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verdi. Mahkeme, bo\u015fanmaya sebep olan olaylarda kad\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu oldu\u011fu kanaatine vararak, bu gerek\u00e7eyle kad\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve manevi tazminat ile yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 taleplerinin reddine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n Karar\u0131n istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1’inci Hukuk Dairesi\u2019ne geldi. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi, yerel mahkemenin kusur tespiti ile tazminat ve nafakan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmelerini yerinde bularak, taraflar\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 esastan reddetti.<\/p>\n KARAR YARGITAY’DAN D\u00d6ND\u00dc<\/strong><\/p>\n Bunun \u00fczerine daval\u0131 ve kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekili, kusur belirlemesi ile tazminat ve nafaka taleplerinin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden karar\u0131 temyiz etti. Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 2’nci Hukuk Dairesi, kad\u0131na kusur olarak y\u00fcklenen davran\u0131\u015flarla ilgili tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay, bu olaylardan sonra evlilik birli\u011finin bir s\u00fcre daha devam etti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekerek, s\u00f6z konusu davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n affedildi\u011fi ya da ho\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sonucuna vard\u0131. Kararda, affedilen veya ho\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fclen olaylardan kusur \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 vurgulanarak, bu olaylar\u0131n kad\u0131na kusur olarak y\u00fcklenmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n Dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki di\u011fer deliller de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, kad\u0131n\u0131n erke\u011fe hakaret etmesi nedeniyle hafif kusurlu, erke\u011fin ise kad\u0131na hakaret etmesi ve eve ge\u00e7 saatlerde gelmesi nedeniyle a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi ifade edildi. Bu nedenle, kad\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu say\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 kusur tespitinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu kaydedildi.<\/p>\n YARGITAY: KADIN YARARINA TAZM\u0130NAT VE NAFAKA GEREK\u0130R<\/strong><\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay ayr\u0131ca, hatal\u0131 kusur de\u011ferlendirmesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak kad\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve manevi tazminat taleplerinin reddedilmesini de do\u011fru bulmad\u0131. Erke\u011fin kusurlu davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n kad\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 zedeledi\u011fi ve bo\u015fanma sonucu kad\u0131n\u0131n maddi destekten yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na uygun miktarda maddi ve manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p>\n Kad\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenli ve s\u00fcrekli bir gelirinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bo\u015fanmaya sebep olan olaylarda kusurunun daha a\u011f\u0131r olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na da i\u015faret eden Yarg\u0131tay, yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funu, buna ra\u011fmen nafaka talebinin reddedilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtti.<\/p>\n Bu gerek\u00e7elerle Yarg\u0131tay, kusur ile tazminat ve nafaka konusunda verilen kararlar\u0131 bozarak dosyay\u0131 yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fclmek \u00fczere yerel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n Kaynak :\u00a0http:\/\/www.milliyet.com.tr\/gundem\/yargitaydan-bosanmalarda-emsal-karar-affedilen-kusur-sayilmaz-7515761<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Yarg\u0131tay 2\u2019nci Hukuk Dairesi, bo\u015fanma davalar\u0131nda dengeleri de\u011fi\u015ftirecek emsal bir karara imza att\u0131. Evlilik birli\u011fi devam ederken affedilen ya da ho\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fclen davran\u0131\u015flardan y\u0131llar sonra kusur \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmeden Yarg\u0131tay, yerel mahkemenin kad\u0131n\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu sayarak tazminat ve nafaka taleplerini reddetmesini bozdu. Karar, binlerce bo\u015fanma dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in yol g\u00f6sterici nitelik ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":163805,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[4611,8111,3922,446,10815],"class_list":["post-163804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guncel","tag-bosanma","tag-kadini","tag-kusur","tag-mahkeme","tag-nafaka"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163804"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":163806,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163804\/revisions\/163806"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/163805"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kamucalisani.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}